Understanding length
The math, made plain.
Two systems, one bridge, three worked conversions.
The metric ladder.
The metric system is built on tens. Climb the ladder one rung at a time and you multiply by ten; jump the right gaps and you reach a hundred or a thousand. Once one length is known, the rest follow without arithmetic gymnastics.
1 m = 100 cm · 1 km = 1 000 m · 1 km = 1 000 000 mm
The imperial chain.
Imperial lengths come from older customs — feet from feet, yards from strides, miles from a thousand Roman paces. The ratios aren't tidy, but they're memorable. Twelve inches make a foot; three feet, a yard; one thousand seven hundred and sixty yards, a mile.
1 ft = 12 in · 1 yd = 36 in · 1 mi = 5280 ft
Where metric meets imperial.
Metric and imperial are linked by a single, exact definition. Since the International Yard and Pound Agreement of 1959, an inch is — by treaty — exactly 2.54 centimetres. Every cross-system length conversion you will ever need follows from that one line.
1 inch ≡ 2.54 cm
Derived bridges
- 1 foot = 30.48 cm
- 1 yard = 0.9144 m
- 1 mile = 1.609344 km
- 1 nautical mile = 1.852 km
Three worked conversions.
Each conversion has just two ingredients: the right factor, and which way to apply it. If the source unit is the larger of the two, divide; if it's the smaller, multiply.
5 kilometres to miles
1 mile = 1.609344 km
A mile is bigger than a kilometre, so to get the smaller count we divide.
5 ÷ 1.609344 ≈ 3.106856
= 3.106856 mi
100 feet to metres
1 foot = 0.3048 m
A foot is smaller than a metre, but we're converting a count of feet into metres — so multiply.
100 × 0.3048 = 30.48
= 30.48 m
6 inches to centimetres
1 inch = 2.54 cm
An inch is larger than a centimetre, so the count grows — multiply.
6 × 2.54 = 15.24
= 15.24 cm
A note on precision.
Every conversion above runs in your browser using IEEE 754 double-precision arithmetic — accurate to about fifteen significant digits. That's a millimetre of error in two thousand kilometres. For everyday use it's exact; surveyors and metrologists should treat the published bridges as authoritative.
Read next